Before jumping into the review, an introduction:
Out of
all the super heroes in existence, Superman is by far the least interesting.
The man is literally invincible, kryptonite being his one weakness. Superman is
what all super heroes should be: a paragon of justice, never kills, always
saves the day and never breaks his moral code. I say this having a limited
knowledge of Superman comics because American comics are a giant mess of alternate
universes and that sort of nonsense. Because Superman is the “Jesus” of all super heroes, it is hard to
make him an interesting character. Decades
of comics are a testament to DC’s failures in this regard. The existing Superman movies also
fail to make Superman more than an immovable object. However, Man of Steel is a game changer — if
you squint hard enough.
Info:
IMDB - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0770828/
Rotten Tomatoes -
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/superman_man_of_steel/
Genres: super hero, alien invasion, science
fiction, romance (sort of).
Concept:
This is a reboot movie. We don’t see Superman in his traditional garb until easily half way
through the movie. I believe this movie
attempted to “Nolenize” Superman. Similar to the new Batman movies. We get a
reboot that doesn’t start with Superman saving people from natural disasters.
Movies involving Superman saving people from natural disasters are boring and
stupid. In the early comics he did that stuff because superheroes were a new
thing, but it’s 2013, not 1938. Instead they went with the Zodd storyline, not original, but still a fantastic choice. Superman is more human and vulnerable in this
film. His role as the protector of Earth still exists in the gray.
Characters:
Cal-El/Clark Kent:
We all know who Clark is.
A good kid from Kansas with super powers. His character has not changed, but
the movie presents him in an believable way.
Man of Steel shows a Clark that struggles with his
identity, who fears to use his powers around others humans. Despite his
father’s fear, Clark’s nature encourages him to help people. He does not help
them as Superman, simply as a ghost or a phantom. Clark develops into Superman
versus starting out as him. It still kills me that the people of Metropolis
can’t tell that Clark is superman. Yes, glasses and a timid personality are the
perfect way to hide your identity.
Lois
Lane:
She takes a more direct role in this movie. Lois chases the
ghost-like Clark across the earth and learns about his true identity almost alongside
him. I have been told that traditionally Lois Lane isn’t aware of Clark’s real identity. I
thought it was a good choice to have a Lois that is aware. This creates a
different romantic tension. Lois has always been portrayed as a strong,
independent women, but Man of Steel gives Lois a third trait:
survivability. She is resourceful and quick on her feet. She is also plays a
fundamental role in the battle against Zodd. By making Lois a stronger, less
informational ignorant character; Clark is more vulnerable. Also Amy Adams was well chosen for the role.
Jor-El:
He is Kal-El’s
original father and part of the Kryptonian noble house of El. He is the colony
ship’s A.I, a “shadow” of Jor-El’s former conscious. Yet, it has the ability to
think on its own and analyze situations like a person would. It’s like Jor-El
didn’t really die on Krypton. He is one of the film’s larger failings.
General
Zodd:
He is the supreme commander, one of the last surviving
Kryptonians and the main antagonist of the movie. Zodd is a fantastic villain
because he genuinely believes his actions are right. Evil that believes it is just is far more compelling than Evil that knows its own falsity. Only from a
human perspective are his actions wrong. This creates a nice moral ambiguity.
This also compounds Clark’s
identity crisis. Thus, Zodd is one of the better parts of this movie.
The
Kent Family:
I decided to combine Mr. Kent and Mrs. Kent because they fulfill
the same purpose in the Superman Universe. They are the human element in Clark’s life and help him resolve his alien
versus human crisis.
Plot:
Nothing truly original has been made in a at least a couple
thousand years. It is unfortunate that this movie is a carbon copy. The story
is taken straight from Superman
II. In many ways the plot is this movie’s
biggest failing and strength. Way back in the day, on Krypton, Zodd revolts
against the existing government. He and his followers are caught and banished
to an alternate space realm called the Phantom Zone. Krypton’s eventual end
frees Zodd from the P.Z. and he begins the search for a new home. Through a
series of events, Zodd finds his way to earth. Thus beginning the conflict between
him and Clark, etc.
The Zodd plot is
a solid way to start off a Superman reboot, unfortunately the movie fails on
delivery. The whole first half of the movie has too much going on. For reasons
unknown to me, the movie spends at least twenty minutes on Krypton. The slight
expansion of Clark’s origins were interesting, but unnecessary. Jor-El tries to
warn the Kryptonian government of Krypton’s impending doom. Zodd and Jor-El
have a confrontation about the future of their race—blah blah blah. Why do the
viewers need to see this? Is this information essential? No. Clark is sent to earth in his pod. A dramatic
imagine of his mother being consumed by Krypton’s death throes is shown. Since the
audience knows nothing about Jor-El or his wife, their death’s create no
dramatic tension. I can understand the
need to frame the conflict for the movie, but it is only necessary if the
narrative is completely new.
Flash forward to
Clark being an adult. He looks like a hobo and drifts from place to place
saving people in need. I like this because Clark’s inherently good nature is
revealed in a non-contrived way. Kent Senior’s ideals are embodied by him: save
people, but never reveal your powers. Vignettes of his childhood are revealed
every time he closes his eyes. This is a fantastic way to show Superman’s past
without burdening the viewer, expect that it had to be rushed. I didn’t get a
full understanding of Clark’s childhood because the vignettes were too
disconnected. Why was Clark remembering these memories specifically as he was
traveling? The movie does not provide an explanation beyond: you, the audience,
need to know. Not good enough. One Vignette was done very well.
There was not enough time to really flesh Kent Senior out.
There was not enough time to really flesh Kent Senior out.
Due to
the time constraints, we don’t
see Clark process any of what he just learned. To move Superman away from the
Jesus of all Superheroes, the audience needs to see him struggle with this. I
have to project Clark’s process into the movie which is bad writing. Furthermore, Jor-El continues to play a significant role in the
movie. To the point where he becomes
fundamental in the fight against Zodd.
Zodd’s crew is going to exact the codex form Clark. The Kryptonian ship’s atmosphere weakens Clark to human levels of strength. Through the El House Key, Louis brings Jor-El onto Zodd’s ship. He proceeds to change the atmosphere of the ship to Earths and saves Louis.
After that I thought, “Bro, you’re dead. Stop showing up with your Deus
Ex Machina bull crap.” Louis or Clark should have found a way out on their own.
As one might guess, Zodd shows up to earth and demands Clark’s immediate surrender or he’ll blow Earth
into space rocks. Clark does, stuff happens and both of them have an epic
battle in New York.
I am forgetting something—oh right, the codex.
I am forgetting something—oh right, the codex.
The codex of
Krypton is Man of Steel’s biggest plot hole. The audience learns about
the codex way back in the first twenty minutes of the film. Folks on Krypton no
longer feel the need to reproduce naturally and rely on a birthing matrix,
basically a huge tank of water with little disgusting gray fetuses floating
around. The “codex” holds all the genetic information for their entire race
from noble houses to peasants. Each Kryptonian is born for a predestined
purpose. Jor-El has the bright idea to put the codex inside of Clark. I have no
idea why or what kind of implications that action has. The movie doesn’t go
into it at all. Does that mean Clark’s children will have the same genetic code
as the first born of the noble houses on Krypton? No idea. Does it matter at
all? Apparently not. Jor-El could have just placed the codex in the pod, but no
he put it is inside Clark. So Superman is his own race--well that’s just sad.
The codex is a maguffin to bring Zodd into conflict with Clark. It serves no
other purpose.
Despite some of
these problems, the atmosphere in the second half redeems this movie. The people
of Earth dislike Clark because he is a Kryptonian, one of “them.” Even after
the movie ends the only person who seems to genuinely like Clark is Louis. Looks like
Kent Senior was right. The earth people’s reaction seems more realistic to me.
Superman could subdue every nation and only break a mild sweat. Folks aren’t
going to welcome such a creature with open arms. The conclusion to Clark’s fight
with Zodd made an impact.
The romance
between Clark and Louis is another problem. It didn’t feel forced, but the plot
moved too quickly for me to believe it. Action was the focus of the film, but a few romantic scenes with them together in a non-official capacity
would have sold it for me. Honestly, they should kept it more ambiguous and
saved the passionate kiss for the second movie (if there is a sequel planned at
all). A quick side note: they did not introduce kryptonite into this
movie which was awesome.
Special Effects:
Like most modern blockbusters, Man of Steel
has above standard special effects. Aesthetically speaking this movie has a lot
going for it. Every thing about the Kryptonians looks strange and unfamiliar.
Despite looking human they seemed like aliens. Their suits are in the same
vein.
Unfortunately, the cg could have been better. It becomes
overwhelming as Clark and Zodd tear through Metropolis. In fact the latter half
of the movie suffers from it. If excessive cg doesn’t bother you then you will
love the fight scenes. Just to clarify, I am not saying the fight scenes
weren’t awesome. Believe me, they were. Just a little cheesy at times.
The move to darker colors for Superman’s outfit was a good idea; another
form of Nolenization. Red and black give a more sinister vibe which reflects
the reaction of people to Clark’s super human abilities.
![]() |
Now that's a Badass |
![]() |
The cosmetic changes are small, but gives Superman an edge |
Score: 6/10
Man
of Steel was an attempt to make the
most boring superhero more interesting and relatable. In good conscious I can’t rag on that too much. The over-used Zodd storyline and poor execution dragged
this movie down. Plot holes and unanswered questions make this reboot hard to
defend. If the writers had taken a little more time to smooth out the minor
details and get the pace under control, this film would have received a higher
score. The foundation was there, but the
building on top was sort of rubbish. Hopefully, Superman movies of the future will learn the
good qualities of this movie and never repeat the mistakes. At the end of the
day, watch it. It’s a decent action movie that doesn’t totally suck.